Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Pattern to Process:
Development of a Signature Program
in Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Interdisciplinary  Environmental Research Initiatives at Michigan State University
2
Our Vision
3
Vision
  • By capitalizing on MSU’s existing strengths as the nation’s premier Land Grant University, we will create a nationally and internationally recognized interdisciplinary Signature Program on Land Use and Land Cover Change Research which will serve to stimulate excellence in teaching and outreach within Michigan and beyond.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Human- Environmental Integration
12
System linkages
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
Capacities and Strengths
23
Strategic Opportunities
24
MSU’s Unique Niche
25
MSU Resources
  • Faculty talents and expertise
  • Departmental initiatives and laboratories
  • College programs and initiatives
  • Campus wide programs, centers and institutes
  • International programs, centers and institutes
  • Institutional organizations for applied research and outreach (MAES, MSUE)
26
 
27
Integrative scholarship, management, public policies:
 
a pathway to the realization of an MSU signature program
in land use and land cover change
28
 
29
MSU’s Delivery Systems in the Policy Sciences and Leadership Training Programs to Inform Public Policy Decision Makers
  • County and local governance, technical and leadership training (MSUE)
  • State-wide political leadership training (MPLP)
  • Public policy and leadership training for newly elected state legislators (LLP) and local government officials
  • Legislative staff training (LLP)
  • Community and economic development education (CD-AOE)(ED-AOE) and land use education (LU-AOE)
  • Various public policy and community development degree programs
  • Virtual University
  • Land use regulation studies (DCL, etc)
  • Environmental journalism
  • MSU capitol access office, Lansing
  • MSU Washington, D.C. Office and Study Program
30
MSU is Committed to the Invention of “Integrative Management” in the University’s Organizational Behavior
31
Implementing the Vision for a Signature Program in Land Use and Land Cover Change
32
Why Land Use
  • Interdisciplinary nature, couples biological and social systems
  • Critical nexus between issues related to human health and welfare (disease, food, fiber, water quality)
  • Significant issue in policy arenas from local to global
  • Major agent of change globally and locally
  • Pragmatic tool to integrate diverse campus expertise in environmental programs together
33
Objectives
  • Establish a unique nationally and internationally recognized research program in Land Use and Land Cover Change as a central, contributory element of MSU’s environmental research initiative.
  • Demonstrate through interactive Extension and education programs land use scenarios based on varying policy, socioeconomic, and environmental inputs.
  • Create an interdisciplinary focus for a campus-wide activity which enhances and expands MSU externally funded research.
  • Develop new opportunities for excellence in teaching and Extension coupled to an active research program.
  • Incubate new technologies for improved campus and public access to information about the state of the local, regional, and global environment.
  • Stimulate new modes of  entrepreneurial activities : “We cannot simply do the same things better, we must do new things”


34
Reshaping the MSU Environmental Program
  • Build on recent successes (BSRSI, PERM, Computational Ecology, Internet-2) to galvanize a broad-based, university-wide effort.
  • Twin these recent successes with other nationally and internationally recognized strengths and successes (e.g. MSUE, MAES, KBS/LTER)
  • Link strengths in basic research to applications and outreach through MSU institutional programs (e.g. MSUE, RESAC)
  • Partner internal investments with external resources from a suite of private and public sources (e.g. federal, state, private sector, foundations, NGOs)
  • Evolve from recent notable initiatives: e.g. NASA Center of Excellence, NASA Earth Science Data Center, Landsat-7 receiving station
35
Themes and approach
  • Capture the patterns of change  using new earth observing satellites (e.g. Landsat 7, EOS), in-situ measurements (e.g. weather and climate, water quality), and socio-demographic data (e.g. digital census databases, surveys, digital atlases).
  • Understand the fundamental processes driving change through field-based analyses, surveys, and research efforts, which provide on-the-ground insight.
  • Synthesis, assessment, and evaluation  using models, report cards and outreach tools and programs in response to local, state, regional, national, and international policy needs.
  • Engagement  of policy arenas and stakeholders to assess their needs and potentials
  • Information dissemination  to a broad user community using computational and visualization technology for managing  complex ecological and landscape information from the global to local scales.
36
LUCC Emphasis
  • Research and Outreach themes will  promote and enable:
  • Sound policy tied to environmental research
  • New pathways for university environmental science
  • Linkage between biological systems and social systems
  • Understanding Role of human disturbance and management
  • Global Change and Earth System Science research and action
  • Understanding processes of social and economic globalization
  • Enhancements in environmental and human welfare/security
  • Address the Inter-relationship between global and local concerns
  • Upper Great Lakes regional applications of research and outreach, e.g. RESAC
  • Such studies will have policy relevance for Michigan and beyond
37
 
38
Land Use and Land Cover Components
39
Examples which extend existing initiatives
  • Coordinating a network of existing Michigan and regional projects, such as the North Central Regional Agroecosystem Assessment (USDA funded), and the Grand Traverse Bay Land Transformation Initiatives (Great Lakes Protection program).
  • Extending the research and outreach under the NSF LTER at KBS to region-wide scale through remote sensing. Also LTER Great Lakes Initiative.
  • Regionalization of Extension: developing multi-state alliances with other Land Grant Universities (UWisc, UMinn) and state and federal agencies as a NASA  supported Regional Earth Science Applications Center for resource management using remote sensing.
  • Developing an LTER-like analog in the tropics in Costa Rica for research and teaching (less expensive foreign experience).
  • Expanding the NSF funded GLOBE and NASA funded ESSE projects to develop  a new high technology based curriculum in global change and environment
  • Development of a remote sensing receiving station through NASA and NSF
40
Reshaping the University’s Approach
41
An Environmental Science Enterprise
  • Research-centered, with strong ties to applications and Extension/outreach, graduate and undergraduate education
  • Flexibility in design to promote and support:
    • An enterprise which can adjust to changing national and university priorities
    • Cross college and cross discipline collaboration
    • Ways to enhance entrepreneurial initiatives
    • An emphasis on excellence
  • University core support  with external and community partners
  • Multi-source external support: federal, state, foundations, private sector
42
New ways to bring groups together
  • An Environmental Research Enterprise:
    • Brings groups together from across the campus mission
  • An Environmental Research Enterprise Zone:
    • A central place where some groups could co-locate for collaboration
    • Not a Center  but a dynamic enterprise zone in which expertise in LULCC can come or go as priorities change
  • The Environmental Research Collaboratory:
    • A laboratory without walls, using network technology to tie groups together, either on campus or off campus -- including state agencies and foreign colleagues
43
Enterprise and Collaboratory concept
44
 
45
An Example: Regional Earth Sciences Applications Center (RESAC)
46
 
47
End of slides
48
National focus for collaboration
49
Action Plan
50
Action strategy
  • Enabling effort:
    • Focus on a core of successful and critical groups to jump start it
    • Create a place and means for collaboration
  • Expansion effort:
    • Define some early crystalizing activities
    • Enable entrepreneurial Chairs, Deans, and faculty to extend participation
51
Action strategy, continued
  • Core support for the Enterprise (or, Environment Research Institute)
  • Opportunities for group-targeted support
    • e.g. directed and strategic initiatives
    • e.g. competitive grants
    • e.g. bridge support for existing programs
  • Clear policy on external matching
52
Enabling effort: core groups
53
Enabling effort: core people
  • BSRSI (Skole, Qi)
  • BSRSI affilliates (Zoo:Lindell, BOT: Malmstrom)
  • GEO (Brown)
  • CRS (Groop, Lusch)
  • Landscape Ecology/PERM (Liu)
  • Computational Ecology and Visualization Laboratory (Gage)
  • Kellogg Biological Station/Long Term Ecological Research (Robertson, Gross, Klug, Hamilton)
  • Center for Integrated Plant Systems (Whalon)



  • MAES (Harwood)
  • Geology/CNS (Long, Pijanowski)
  • Zoology (Holekamp, Stevenson)
  • Sociology (Vanderpool, Harris)
  • Ag Econ (Batie)
  • Resource Dev’mnt (Fridgen)
  • Anthropology (Durman, Furguson)
  • International (Whiteford)
  • Fisheries/Aquatic (Soranno)
  • Engineering (Dale)
  • CommArts (Biocca)



54
Enabling effort: needs
  • Needed Initiatives:
    • Human Dimensions Research: institutions, agency
    • Public Policy and Integrated Assessment
    • Agriculture as a Biological System
    • Climatology and Climate Change: GCMs/ Meso Scale analyses
    • Long range transport of organisms in the atmosphere

55
Enabling effort: core programs
  • Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station programs
  • International Study Programs
  • Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program
  • Social Science Environmental group
  • Other groups TBD
56
Enabling effort: undergraduate participation
  • Undergraduate students will be a major component of the LU-LC Change through an array of undergraduate mentoring and scholarship programs
  • Students will participate from:
    • Bailey Scholars
    • Lyman Briggs School
    • Rise Program
    • Earth System Science Education
    • GLOBE
    • Others
57
Enabling effort
  • Create an office of the environmental research enterprise
    • Associate Scientists (2)
    • Administrative leader (1)
    • Technical leader (1)
  • Install the Enterprise Zone with initial tenants
    • Manly Miles: BSRSI, RESAC, CRS, CEVL outpost, LE outpost, Botany outpost, Landscape Ecology outpost
    • requires some renovation, furniture, equipment, network lines, administrative and technical support
58
Enabling effort
  • Install initial Collaboraties
    • KBS RS/GIS Lab, Las Alturas station, Landscape Ecology Lab, CEVL, other TBD
    • will require cost-matching to departments and units
    • will require network lines

59
Enabling effort
  • Critical programmatic and institutional recasting:
    • need to “reinvent” existing initiatives as programs of the new enterprise or institute, with some resource reprogramming -- e.g. MAES appointments
60
Expansion effort
  • Announce initial program with, call for additional interests
  • Use strategic solicitations to bring entrepreneurial departments into the enterprise as new starts:
    • Initiatives are incubated in departments (Departmentally driven scenario) for a two year period
      • can also be incubated at the College level, or from the Administration, or from within the enterprise
    • successful initiatives move fully into the Enterprise as they flourish on their own
61
Expansion effort
  • Use an Initiative Roundtable to generate new ideas and build cross-campus collaborations/partners
    • becomes a regular part of the Enterprise/Institute itself through a “systems synergy” facility (video conferencing, remote whiteboards, training center, computer visualization, etc)
  • Provide opportunities for inbound sabbatical professorships to work on synthesis of older initiatives and development of new ones.
62
Expansion effort
  • Develop some very early activities to crystalize the Enterprise and gain wide participation
    • e.g. a major conference for the end of the year 2001
    • output will provide ideas for programmatic priorities and opportunities
    • visibility
    • builds cohesive teamwork and collaboration
63
Toward campus-wide involvement
64
Management structure
  • MSU Stakeholders: VPRGS, MAES, Environmental Deans
  • A steering committee comprise of “internal” and “external” stakeholders
    • VPRGS office, MAES
    • Enterprise Program Directors
    • Chairs, Deans, faculty
  • Independent external consultative/review group
      • Distinguished professors, CEOs, agency people, etc

65
Save slides
66
MSU’s Unique Niche
  • Internationally recognized research in forestry, agriculture, water resources, human health and all other necessary real-world applications.
  • Integration of social and biophysical sciences for a truly interdisciplinary approach
  • Advanced remote sensing and spatial analysis at a large scale
  • Unique access and know-how for using massive amounts of spatial data.
  • Information systems technology to disseminate information
  • All necessary components at a time when no other university is responding