|
1
|
- Interdisciplinary Environmental
Research Initiatives at Michigan State University
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- By capitalizing on MSU’s existing strengths as the nation’s premier Land
Grant University, we will create a nationally and internationally
recognized interdisciplinary Signature Program on Land Use and Land
Cover Change Research which will serve to stimulate excellence in
teaching and outreach within Michigan and beyond.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Faculty talents and expertise
- Departmental initiatives and laboratories
- College programs and initiatives
- Campus wide programs, centers and institutes
- International programs, centers and institutes
- Institutional organizations for applied research and outreach (MAES,
MSUE)
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- County and local governance, technical and leadership training (MSUE)
- State-wide political leadership training (MPLP)
- Public policy and leadership training for newly elected state
legislators (LLP) and local government officials
- Legislative staff training (LLP)
- Community and economic development education (CD-AOE)(ED-AOE) and land
use education (LU-AOE)
- Various public policy and community development degree programs
- Virtual University
- Land use regulation studies (DCL, etc)
- Environmental journalism
- MSU capitol access office, Lansing
- MSU Washington, D.C. Office and Study Program
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- Interdisciplinary nature, couples biological and social systems
- Critical nexus between issues related to human health and welfare
(disease, food, fiber, water quality)
- Significant issue in policy arenas from local to global
- Major agent of change globally and locally
- Pragmatic tool to integrate diverse campus expertise in environmental
programs together
|
|
33
|
- Establish a unique nationally and internationally recognized research
program in Land Use and Land Cover Change as a central, contributory
element of MSU’s environmental research initiative.
- Demonstrate through interactive Extension and education programs land
use scenarios based on varying policy, socioeconomic, and environmental
inputs.
- Create an interdisciplinary focus for a campus-wide activity which
enhances and expands MSU externally funded research.
- Develop new opportunities for excellence in teaching and Extension coupled
to an active research program.
- Incubate new technologies for improved campus and public access to
information about the state of the local, regional, and global
environment.
- Stimulate new modes of entrepreneurial
activities : “We cannot simply do the same things better, we must do new
things”
|
|
34
|
- Build on recent successes (BSRSI, PERM, Computational Ecology,
Internet-2) to galvanize a broad-based, university-wide effort.
- Twin these recent successes with other nationally and internationally
recognized strengths and successes (e.g. MSUE, MAES, KBS/LTER)
- Link strengths in basic research to applications and outreach through
MSU institutional programs (e.g. MSUE, RESAC)
- Partner internal investments with external resources from a suite of
private and public sources (e.g. federal, state, private sector,
foundations, NGOs)
- Evolve from recent notable initiatives: e.g. NASA Center of Excellence,
NASA Earth Science Data Center, Landsat-7 receiving station
|
|
35
|
- Capture the patterns of change
using new earth observing satellites (e.g. Landsat 7, EOS),
in-situ measurements (e.g. weather and climate, water quality), and
socio-demographic data (e.g. digital census databases, surveys, digital
atlases).
- Understand the fundamental processes driving change through field-based
analyses, surveys, and research efforts, which provide on-the-ground
insight.
- Synthesis, assessment, and evaluation
using models, report cards and outreach tools and programs in
response to local, state, regional, national, and international policy
needs.
- Engagement of policy arenas and
stakeholders to assess their needs and potentials
- Information dissemination to a
broad user community using computational and visualization technology
for managing complex ecological
and landscape information from the global to local scales.
|
|
36
|
- Research and Outreach themes will
promote and enable:
- Sound policy tied to environmental research
- New pathways for university environmental science
- Linkage between biological systems and social systems
- Understanding Role of human disturbance and management
- Global Change and Earth System Science research and action
- Understanding processes of social and economic globalization
- Enhancements in environmental and human welfare/security
- Address the Inter-relationship between global and local concerns
- Upper Great Lakes regional applications of research and outreach, e.g.
RESAC
- Such studies will have policy relevance for Michigan and beyond
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Coordinating a network of existing Michigan and regional projects, such
as the North Central Regional Agroecosystem Assessment (USDA funded),
and the Grand Traverse Bay Land Transformation Initiatives (Great Lakes
Protection program).
- Extending the research and outreach under the NSF LTER at KBS to
region-wide scale through remote sensing. Also LTER Great Lakes
Initiative.
- Regionalization of Extension: developing multi-state alliances with
other Land Grant Universities (UWisc, UMinn) and state and federal
agencies as a NASA supported
Regional Earth Science Applications Center for resource management using
remote sensing.
- Developing an LTER-like analog in the tropics in Costa Rica for research
and teaching (less expensive foreign experience).
- Expanding the NSF funded GLOBE and NASA funded ESSE projects to
develop a new high technology
based curriculum in global change and environment
- Development of a remote sensing receiving station through NASA and NSF
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- Research-centered, with strong ties to applications and
Extension/outreach, graduate and undergraduate education
- Flexibility in design to promote and support:
- An enterprise which can adjust to changing national and university
priorities
- Cross college and cross discipline collaboration
- Ways to enhance entrepreneurial initiatives
- An emphasis on excellence
- University core support with
external and community partners
- Multi-source external support: federal, state, foundations, private
sector
|
|
42
|
- An Environmental Research Enterprise:
- Brings groups together from across the campus mission
- An Environmental Research Enterprise Zone:
- A central place where some groups could co-locate for collaboration
- Not a Center but a dynamic
enterprise zone in which expertise in LULCC can come or go as
priorities change
- The Environmental Research Collaboratory:
- A laboratory without walls, using network technology to tie groups
together, either on campus or off campus -- including state agencies
and foreign colleagues
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- Enabling effort:
- Focus on a core of successful and critical groups to jump start it
- Create a place and means for collaboration
- Expansion effort:
- Define some early crystalizing activities
- Enable entrepreneurial Chairs, Deans, and faculty to extend
participation
|
|
51
|
- Core support for the Enterprise (or, Environment Research Institute)
- Opportunities for group-targeted support
- e.g. directed and strategic initiatives
- e.g. competitive grants
- e.g. bridge support for existing programs
- Clear policy on external matching
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- BSRSI (Skole, Qi)
- BSRSI affilliates (Zoo:Lindell, BOT: Malmstrom)
- GEO (Brown)
- CRS (Groop, Lusch)
- Landscape Ecology/PERM (Liu)
- Computational Ecology and Visualization Laboratory (Gage)
- Kellogg Biological Station/Long Term Ecological Research (Robertson,
Gross, Klug, Hamilton)
- Center for Integrated Plant Systems (Whalon)
- MAES (Harwood)
- Geology/CNS (Long, Pijanowski)
- Zoology (Holekamp, Stevenson)
- Sociology (Vanderpool, Harris)
- Ag Econ (Batie)
- Resource Dev’mnt (Fridgen)
- Anthropology (Durman, Furguson)
- International (Whiteford)
- Fisheries/Aquatic (Soranno)
- Engineering (Dale)
- CommArts (Biocca)
|
|
54
|
- Needed Initiatives:
- Human Dimensions Research: institutions, agency
- Public Policy and Integrated Assessment
- Agriculture as a Biological System
- Climatology and Climate Change: GCMs/ Meso Scale analyses
- Long range transport of organisms in the atmosphere
|
|
55
|
- Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station programs
- International Study Programs
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program
- Social Science Environmental group
- Other groups TBD
|
|
56
|
- Undergraduate students will be a major component of the LU-LC Change
through an array of undergraduate mentoring and scholarship programs
- Students will participate from:
- Bailey Scholars
- Lyman Briggs School
- Rise Program
- Earth System Science Education
- GLOBE
- Others
|
|
57
|
- Create an office of the environmental research enterprise
- Associate Scientists (2)
- Administrative leader (1)
- Technical leader (1)
- Install the Enterprise Zone with initial tenants
- Manly Miles: BSRSI, RESAC, CRS, CEVL outpost, LE outpost, Botany
outpost, Landscape Ecology outpost
- requires some renovation, furniture, equipment, network lines,
administrative and technical support
|
|
58
|
- Install initial Collaboraties
- KBS RS/GIS Lab, Las Alturas station, Landscape Ecology Lab, CEVL, other
TBD
- will require cost-matching to departments and units
- will require network lines
|
|
59
|
- Critical programmatic and institutional recasting:
- need to “reinvent” existing initiatives as programs of the new
enterprise or institute, with some resource reprogramming -- e.g. MAES
appointments
|
|
60
|
- Announce initial program with, call for additional interests
- Use strategic solicitations to bring entrepreneurial departments into
the enterprise as new starts:
- Initiatives are incubated in departments (Departmentally driven
scenario) for a two year period
- can also be incubated at the College level, or from the
Administration, or from within the enterprise
- successful initiatives move fully into the Enterprise as they flourish
on their own
|
|
61
|
- Use an Initiative Roundtable to generate new ideas and build
cross-campus collaborations/partners
- becomes a regular part of the Enterprise/Institute itself through a
“systems synergy” facility (video conferencing, remote whiteboards,
training center, computer visualization, etc)
- Provide opportunities for inbound sabbatical professorships to work on
synthesis of older initiatives and development of new ones.
|
|
62
|
- Develop some very early activities to crystalize the Enterprise and gain
wide participation
- e.g. a major conference for the end of the year 2001
- output will provide ideas for programmatic priorities and opportunities
- visibility
- builds cohesive teamwork and collaboration
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
- MSU Stakeholders: VPRGS, MAES, Environmental Deans
- A steering committee comprise of “internal” and “external” stakeholders
- VPRGS office, MAES
- Enterprise Program Directors
- Chairs, Deans, faculty
- Independent external consultative/review group
- Distinguished professors, CEOs, agency people, etc
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- Internationally recognized research in forestry, agriculture, water
resources, human health and all other necessary real-world applications.
- Integration of social and biophysical sciences for a truly
interdisciplinary approach
- Advanced remote sensing and spatial analysis at a large scale
- Unique access and know-how for using massive amounts of spatial data.
- Information systems technology to disseminate information
- All necessary components at a time when no other university is
responding
|