Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Strategic Partnership Grant

Stuart Gage & David Skole
Departments of Entomology and Geography
MSU
  • Pattern to Process : Development of a Signature Program in Land Use and Land Cover Change
2
Goal: Assist MSU to develop a Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Establish a nationally recognized research program in LUCC as a central, contributory element of MSU’s environmental research initiative
  • Create an interdisciplinary focus for a campus-wide activity to enhance and expand MSU externally funded research
  • Develop new opportunities for excellence in teaching and service coupled to an active research program
  • Stimulate new modes of entrepreneurial activities through expansion and enhancement of existing environmental research
  • Incubate new technologies and improve campus and public assess to information about the state of local, regional, and global environment
3
LUCC Issues
4
Enterprise Concept
5
Enabling a Signature Program on Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Enterprise Development
  • Enterprise Zone Design & Development
  • Outreach to MSU LUCC Initiatives
  • New Initiatives
  • Research and Development
  • Research Proposals
6
Development of the Research Enterprise
  • Established and Executive Committee to guide Enterprise Development
  • Established an ad hoc scientific advisory group to facilitate development of a science plan for the Enterprise
  • Developed a comprehensive long-range Science Plan for MSU’s Land Use and Cover Change Research Enterprise with faculty input
  • Developed an enabling a process for willing researchers to become engaged in the Enterprise Zone


7
Development of the Enterprise Zone
  • Developed facilities for establishment of new LUCC laboratories
  • Established and implemented protocols for faculty associates to join the Enterprise and move into the Enterprise Zone
  • Developed a System Synergism Center for collaboration and proposal development


8
Enterprise Outreach to MSU Land
Initiatives
  • Engaged the Victor Institute to plan and facilitate the next Enterprise workshop focusing on updating MSU Administration on LUCC
  • Presented visions and opportunities for linking LUCC research to Land Use Area of Expertise Extension
  • Provided Financial Support and participated in Speaker Series on LUCC
  • Provided input to Natural Resource Coalition
9
New Research Enterprise Initiatives
  • LUCC Institutional Development
  • “Research Michigan” concept evolved from Brooking Institute linkage
  • MSU’s Environmental Science Research and Graduate Program Development (Environmental Science Cabinet)
10
Enterprise Associated Research Development
  • Regional Earth Science Application Center (Upper Great Lakes Region-NASA)
  • Economic Assessment of Land Based Industries in Michigan (Kellogg Foundation-Public Sector Consultants)
  • Watershed-wide Risk Assessment of the Muskegon River Watershed (GL Protection Fund)
11
Enterprise Illustrations
  • Science Plan: Land Use and Land Cover Change at MSU-Creating A Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Facility Development: A Synergism Center for Collaborative Interactions in the Enterprise Zone
  • Research: Land Based Industries Assessment
  • New Technologies: Detecting Land Use Change at watershed scales


12
 
13
Creating a Research Enterprise on Land Use and Cover Change:
Science Plan
  • Background
  • Participants
  • Part 1:Justification
  • environmental research agenda; scales that matter; significant issuers of our time
  • Part 2: Research priorities and Elements
  • Part 3: Approach to Implementation
  • Vision-Principles-Emphasis
  • Research Enterprise Concept-projects-underpinning units-institutes-positions
  • Part 4: Strategic Position within National Environmental Priorities
  • Part 5: Next Steps


14
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Background: Synopsis
  • “This report thus synthesizes the results of this process culminating in the faculty-MSU wide workshop, providing a Science Plan with some general recommendations for implementation.


  • “It is not the aim of this report to be overly prescriptive. Rather it aims to reflect an agenda open to contributions and initiatives from individual colleges and units in ways that best fit their individual needs, but at the same time contributes to a cohesive program.”


  •  It is our hope that significant collaborative initiatives will emerge to support the research foci laid out in this report. We believe this report will aid the university administration in setting investment priorities, and lead to highly successful and visible outcomes.”
  • David Skole and Stuart Gage, February 2001


15
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Justification and Rationale
  • The program:
  • aims to be truly interdisciplinary and integrative, drawing from both the physical, biological and social sciences,
  • focuses on both the global and local scales, thereby transcending the various issues of the LUCC,
  • although firmly grounded in externally-funded, high profile basic research, it will also address applied issues relevant to the state, region and nation,
  • will be broadly international, and
  • will utilize new tools for spatial analysis which are emerging in remote sensing, geographic information sciences, landscape ecology and other similar fields.


16
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Significant Issues
  • This report presents a design for a major campus-wide LUCC research initiative that will address some of the major intellectual and technological challenges of our time.


  • It is centered on research excellence in the tradition of the land grant university yet forged in a way consistent with new demands on research presented by a rapidly changing and increasingly interdependent global environment and economy of the 21st century.
  • The focus is on building a research program that addresses significant problems of sustainability science, linking research to socially relevant problems at scales that matter.
17
Research Enterprise Science Plan

  • Understanding fundamental causes
  • Institutional policy contexts and constraints
  • Interactions with climate, ecosystems, atmospheric chemistry and water
  • Global Biosphere and Earth System
  • International Dimensions
  • Urban and Metropolitan Environments
  • Disease in Human Populations
  • Ecological Risk and Vulnerability
18
 
19
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Emphasis
  • Although discussed in detail in the text above, we list the areas or program emphasis; these topics make the program different than anything that currently exists on campus, or generally around the country at other institutions:


  •   Integrative research, drawing from the social, biological and physical sciences in a truly interdisciplinary program.


  •  Global scale phenomena that have causal and impact processes at regional or local scales; linking the global to the local.


  •   Spatial attributes and dynamics of patterns and processes, and the use of multi- scale geospatial information systems models and earth observations.
20
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Land Use and Cover Change Research Enterprise
  • Although we call for new administrative structures below which would be centralized in a specific new facility or units, the program should be open to all faculty.


  • The stimulation of an enterprise could largely come through strategic initiatives from at the OVPRGS level, such as targeting relevant themes from this report in the IRGP calls for proposals.


  • These targeted solicitations could routinely use seed money or facilities to create the campus involvement. We argue that the themes address in this plan provide a basis for the prioritization and allocation of funds. It would be useful to target some fraction of the Strategic Partnership funds, or the Intramural Grants Program funds on an annual or rotating basis. It would also be useful for the OVPRGS to make some kind of center-of-excellence designation for the program.


21
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • An expert on the urban and metropolitan issues of sprawl and decentralization, with skills in modeling and quantitative analysis, such as regional science.
  • An expert on the urban and metropolitan issues with respect to social and economic issues, with skills in policy analysis and assessments.
  • A climatologist/atmospheric transport modeler at the meso and macro scales.
  • An atmospheric chemist with skills in tropospheric chemistry to work on problems of aerosol production, region air pollution, and radiative balance.
  • A land use change modeler with skills in geospatial modeling, remote sensing and spatial econometrics.



  • A geographic information systems specialist with skills in distributed, open geospatial software environments.
  • A policy specialist with skills in integrative assessments, regional analysis and environmental impact, nationally and internationally.
  • A specialist in economic development and/or international economics or foreign development.
  • A specialist in medical geography or epidemiology with skills on disease and environment.
  • A systems ecologist with skills in global biosphere, carbon cycle, and climate.
  • A specialist in large-scale hydrology.


22
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • National Priorities
  • In response to a request from NSF to the National Research Council to identify Environmental Science Priorities, the NRC identified eight “Grand Challenges” of which four are recommended for immediate research investments. One of these four is land use dynamics.
  • Here is a summary from the NRC report :
  •  “The challenge is to develop a systematic understanding of changes in land uses and covers that are critical to ecosystem functioning and services and human welfare. Important areas for research include developing long term, regional databases for land uses, land covers, and related social information; developing spatially explicit and multisectoral land-change theory; linking land-change theory to space-based imagery; and developing innovative applications of dynamic spatial simulation techniques.”


23
Research Enterprise Science Plan
  • Next Steps
  • Provide FORUM for the participating community of LUCC scholars to react to this Science Plan and to propose next implementation steps for LUCC research that can be adopted by the Administration.
  • The objectives of the follow up workshop are to:
  •  · Showcase current LUCC research by MSU LUCC scholars through      Presentations, posters and demonstrations;
  •  · Provide a forum to present LUCC research ideas by MSU faculty; and
  •  · Identify existing resources to facilitate the preparation of these LUCC research proposals for submission to organizations that fund LUCC research.
  • We should move forward to capitalize on the national and local potential for LUCC research. MSU has an unprecedented opportunity to continue as a recognized leader in LUCC research and outreach.
24
Enterprise Research & Development
  • Resource-Based Industries Land Use Forum


    • Kellogg Foundation ŕ Michigan Economic
    • and Environmental Roundtable
    • ŕ MSU LUCC Enterprise
25
Resource-Based Industries Land Use Forum
  • Objectives
  • ID and assess key concerns re fragmentation and transformation of land within Michigan as they may affect key industries including agriculture, forestry, mining and tourism
  • Expand the LTM to incorporate and identify key issues for the above industries
  • Modify the LTM to include the entire state of Michigan
  • Use the most recent LUC information in Michigan and adapt the model to this
  • Conduct simulation scenarios using the LTM to address industry concerns
26
Animation of Model Simulation (1980-2040)
27
Mathematical Analysis of Michigan County Characteristics-Fragmentation & Diversity Focus
28
Changing Michigan 1820-2020
29
Landscape Diversity Concept
30
County Class Partitioning
31
Simpson Diversity index
32
High Diversity Counties
33
Southeast Michigan
34
SEMCOG Region
35
Changing West Michigan
36
West Michigan Counties
  • Grand Traverse; Kent; Muskegon; Newago; Ottawa; Wexford


37
West Michigan Counties
  • Grand Traverse; Kent; Muskegon; Newago; Ottawa; Wexford


38
Research Proposals
39
Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Future Directions
  • Institutionalizing the Enterprise
  • Developing the Enterprise Zone
    • System Synergism Center
    • Faculty Attraction (Institutionalization)
  • Research Michigan Initiative
  • Upper Great Lakes Region Initiative
40
Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change
  • Enterprise Zone Development
  • Systems Synergism Center
    • High technology communications facility
      • Collaborative research proposal development
      • Wireless communications
      • Video conferencing (Local->international)
      • Whiteboard technology


41
Domains of Environmental Science
(Vertical and Horizontal View)
42
Research Michigan
  • MISSION:  To focus the university‑wide analytical capacity in the area of land use so as to develop a better understanding of and solutions to the social, economic, and environmental issues and impacts of land use in Michigan. RESEARCH MICHIGAN is a university-based "think tank" that will bring cohesion and a cross-campus focus to land-use research and outreach. This effort is consistent with and a logical next step of Michigan State University=s [MSU=s] land use cover change initiative [see Creating a Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change].


  • BACKGROUND:  RESEARCH MICHIGAN is a multiple-stage, research-based endeavor that is one manifestation of MSU’s Enterprise approach to land use. This approach is an outcome of earlier initiatives by the administration and faculty members from three of MSU’s Colleges (SSC, CANR, & CNS) engaged in environmental science / land-use activities together with the Office of the Vice President of Research & Graduate Studies. RESEARCH MICHIGAN advances and is consistent with at least two of the eight focus areas [#2 and #6] identified in Creating a Research Enterprise on Land Use and Land Cover Change.


43
Upper Great Lakes Region RESAC
  • Continuation Proposal -> NASA Plus
  • Focus on Research Applications related to Climate Issues in the UGLR
  • Link resource management agencies to University Research Capacity
  • Continue Partnerships with USGS/DNR/DOT/USFS/EPA